What Car?

Talk about your cars etc here. Keep it sort of sensible and on topic please.
The Reverend Bluejeans
Prize Cunt
Posts: 6324
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:31 pm
Location: Big Al Granvia’s armpit.
Has thanked: 718 times
Been thanked: 2337 times

Re: What Car?

Post by The Reverend Bluejeans »

chadders wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 7:37 pm Had they fixed the rust issues by then?
Yes. Well mostly. C Class rear subframes rust nicely. That gen E Class is a decent car, E240 petrol is the best bet.
User avatar
LynehamHerc
Boomer, gammon, senile old fart and Eurosmasher!
Posts: 20725
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 1:37 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 13856 times
Been thanked: 3636 times

Re: What Car?

Post by LynehamHerc »

AutoshiteBoy wrote: Sat Jan 09, 2021 10:39 pm The problem is, speaking as a warranty engineer, the wiring looms and the like are sub contracted to the lowest cost producing nation. The components, material and build are generally shit so when there is a problem, the car is approaching scrap value.
From a short term business perspective it makes sense. You need to take into account residuals for a few years so that it remains valuable enough so that lease rates don't get hammered. After that they're not bothered about the later users in my opinion.
Whilst I was qualifying I worked in a biscuit factory. The ingredients of a biscuit were calculated to something like a tenth of a penny.

As SiC has started sending secret messages here's mine:

STD

And it's not Sexually Transmitted Disease
User avatar
cros
The Elastrator
Posts: 5854
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:58 am
Has thanked: 1906 times
Been thanked: 2135 times

Re: What Car?

Post by cros »

mercrocker wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 12:02 am Do you know what......I think I would actually be better off with a 100E....No, make that a 107E. Fucking weirdo side-valves, worse than canbus.
I always wanted a 107e which I believe only came about because the Anglican was 2 door only. My 100e was spoiled by that gruesome engine and 3 speed box- the gap between 2nd and 3rd was like the grand canyon. Otherwise a fine car.
User avatar
paulplom
The Geordie Lord, Mario!
Posts: 26142
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 7:01 am
Has thanked: 10321 times
Been thanked: 5506 times

Re: What Car?

Post by paulplom »

Bangernomics wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 6:20 am Is the v8 in them a ford job or bought in?


Less annoying tag line.
Yamaha iirc?
User avatar
mercrocker
Numb3rP14t3Fun
Posts: 17039
Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 2:53 pm
Has thanked: 12274 times
Been thanked: 8679 times

Re: What Car?

Post by mercrocker »

cros wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:24 am
mercrocker wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 12:02 am Do you know what......I think I would actually be better off with a 100E....No, make that a 107E. Fucking weirdo side-valves, worse than canbus.
I always wanted a 107e which I believe only came about because the Anglican was 2 door only. My 100e was spoiled by that gruesome engine and 3 speed box- the gap between 2nd and 3rd was like the grand canyon. Otherwise a fine car.
Think the 107E was just a stop-gap until the Consul Classic was ready (not that those had a great innings either) and ran alongside the 100E "New" Popular which in itself only existed as a "lowest priced car" loss-leader. A surprising number still about, probably because the engine and transmission lasted more than 40,000 miles.......
There's a great long bar in Rock & Roll heaven.......
User avatar
fried onions
Posts: 3316
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:29 pm
Location: In my safe space (the garage).
Has thanked: 1449 times
Been thanked: 2372 times

Re: What Car?

Post by fried onions »

Sidevalve Ford club is pretty active and there's always plenty to be seen at shows. I might be wrong but I think an oil filter was an optional extra. Proper mingebag motoring.
Squire Dawson


HUMBER - built stronger to last longer.
User avatar
cros
The Elastrator
Posts: 5854
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:58 am
Has thanked: 1906 times
Been thanked: 2135 times

Re: What Car?

Post by cros »

Ford were perverse in those days. They build two 1172 sidevalve engines in the fifties that had very few common parts. The cheaper one lacked replaceable crank bearing shells, oil and air filtration, lacked proper crankcase ventilation and even a water pump. Heres one I endured earlier.
Ford pop.jpg
Ford pop.jpg (180.84 KiB) Viewed 2750 times
The Reverend Bluejeans
Prize Cunt
Posts: 6324
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:31 pm
Location: Big Al Granvia’s armpit.
Has thanked: 718 times
Been thanked: 2337 times

Re: What Car?

Post by The Reverend Bluejeans »

100E's, Zephyrs 1-3, Classics etc were the last properly built Fords. From the 105E onwards they just seemed to be rot boxes. Escorts were terrible.
User avatar
mercrocker
Numb3rP14t3Fun
Posts: 17039
Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 2:53 pm
Has thanked: 12274 times
Been thanked: 8679 times

Re: What Car?

Post by mercrocker »

I'm always amazed how solid derelict 100Es often are. The vans and estates seemed to suffer more, though.
There's a great long bar in Rock & Roll heaven.......
User avatar
AutoshiteBoy
Posts: 3002
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 12:51 pm
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: What Car?

Post by AutoshiteBoy »

Another car I can vouch for as being built to impossibly high standards yet using old tech is the Burnaston-built Toyota Avensis (petrol).
Post Reply