1963 Rover P4 110

Talk about your cars etc here. Keep it sort of sensible and on topic please.
SiC
It's S small i C
Posts: 9373
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:59 am
Has thanked: 1826 times
Been thanked: 5404 times

Re: 1963 Rover P4 110

Post by SiC »

I was hoping to pick up the Spitfire today but Hagerty closes at 1pm on Saturday and not open on Sunday ffs
User avatar
Hooli
Self Appointed Internet God
Posts: 33544
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:25 pm
Has thanked: 14345 times
Been thanked: 11128 times

Re: 1963 Rover P4 110

Post by Hooli »

PhilA wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 2:10 pm My father said he preferred the Midget over the Spitfire, because the Spitfire rear suspension with its' Beetle-esque tuck in made the back end much less predictable when being pushed than the Midget.
He said the Midget was faster in the corners as a result.
I think that was fixed on later Spits?I

Mind you quarter elliptical springs on Sprites are meant to be interesting too
Private signature, do not read
User avatar
christine
Posts: 4240
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:50 pm
Has thanked: 1325 times
Been thanked: 1718 times

Re: 1963 Rover P4 110

Post by christine »

The late vitesse and gt6 got the rotoflex set up , i don't think the herald or spitfire did ,
User avatar
christine
Posts: 4240
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:50 pm
Has thanked: 1325 times
Been thanked: 1718 times

Re: 1963 Rover P4 110

Post by christine »

Anyone cut the retaining band off ,before fitting a new rotoflex doughnut ? :oops:
User avatar
PhilA
Posts: 2967
Joined: Thu May 30, 2019 1:24 pm
Location: Larose, LA, USA
Has thanked: 934 times
Been thanked: 6539 times
Contact:

Re: 1963 Rover P4 110

Post by PhilA »

Hooli wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 3:45 pm I think that was fixed on later Spits?I

Mind you quarter elliptical springs on Sprites are meant to be interesting too
Maybe so; he only ever had mk 2 on up, so all standard A35 underpinnings.
Pontac Cheepten
Plymmut Furey
Jaaaaag
User avatar
Eddie Honda
Rainman The Google Fu Master
Posts: 21559
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 10:45 pm
Location: 寄居町
Has thanked: 13450 times
Been thanked: 13265 times

Re: 1963 Rover P4 110

Post by Eddie Honda »

christine wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 4:07 pm Anyone cut the retaining band off ,before fitting a new rotoflex doughnut ? :oops:
Yes, but it wouldn't have gone on otherwise! Bloody PSA shite.
BenHar
Banned Grinch!
Posts: 2344
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 2:16 pm
Location: Reigate, Surrey
Has thanked: 2135 times
Been thanked: 506 times

Re: 1963 Rover P4 110

Post by BenHar »

christine wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 3:58 pm The late vitesse and gt6 got the rotoflex set up , i don't think the herald or spitfire did ,
The MKIV Spitfire had a flatter spring and longer half shafts which improved it slightly.

Ben
User avatar
Jerzy Woking
Posts: 3662
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2021 8:18 pm
Location: Espaná
Has thanked: 2554 times
Been thanked: 1636 times

Re: 1963 Rover P4 110

Post by Jerzy Woking »

This was a great thread, sad to see the P4 go, but as you close one door, you open up another.

Look forward to seeing something along these lines with the Spitfire.

No pressure!
User avatar
cuntbuster
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2022 11:18 am
Has thanked: 501 times
Been thanked: 99 times

Re: 1963 Rover P4 110

Post by cuntbuster »

Hey SiC there's a p4 for 400 quid on the beige. Not trying to tempt you but maybe you know someone.
Who you gonna call
SiC
It's S small i C
Posts: 9373
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:59 am
Has thanked: 1826 times
Been thanked: 5404 times

Re: 1963 Rover P4 110

Post by SiC »

That car is what started this thread but bailed out as too much work and ended up with this 110 I bought in the end! Tbh it probably was a good outcome as the other needs a bit too much work considering the project backlog I have.
Post Reply