Cars Where The Reality Failed To Live Up To The Expectation

Talk about your cars etc here. Keep it sort of sensible and on topic please.
User avatar
Jerzy Woking
Posts: 3663
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2021 8:18 pm
Location: Espaná
Has thanked: 2555 times
Been thanked: 1640 times

Re: Cars Where The Reality Failed To Live Up To The Expectation

Post by Jerzy Woking »

I had a hankering for another decent sized wafter, and decided I'd like a Jaguar X300 4.0 litre.

Found one for sale near to work at a back street dealer trading from a railway archway. It did look good though, so I handed over very little money, thinking it was a bargain.

Every car has a common fault or two that you expect to crop up now and again.

The Jag had common fault after common fault after common fault. I read a few forums, and every fault that was mentioned mine had in the little time I owned it.

Sold it for less than scrap money a few weeks later. I would still like another, as the ride quality was, well, quality.
20190704_213344.jpg
20190704_213344.jpg (160.11 KiB) Viewed 437 times
DodgeRover
Posts: 13760
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:24 pm
Has thanked: 1827 times
Been thanked: 2714 times

Re: Cars Where The Reality Failed To Live Up To The Expectation

Post by DodgeRover »

Warren t claim wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am gpz1.PNG

Yes, I know this isn't a car but it deserves a place on this thread.

The GPZ500. For all the shit talked about it at the time hyping it as the "4 Stroke LC" in reality, it was a bag of underpowered wank. As the training schools ran ER5's with the same engine I should have known better.
Never heard then described as that before, I thought that title went to either the FZ600 or one of the mental 20,000 rpm 250 or 400 grey imports.
Post Reply